![]() |
Return to: Articles & Information You Can Use |
| Copyright ©
1998, Nanette Miner Level 2 Evaluation PrimerBy Nanette Miner, EdD Did you know that improperly constructed test questions can result in legal cases? It's true. If someone is denied a raise or promotion due to flunking a test you created, you may have to defend the validity of your test questions. To paraphrase Odin Westgaard, the guru of test creation:
The number one rule in evaluating and testing is DO NOT TRICK THEM. If you have not taught it in the training, it should not be on the test. Likewise, you should state your test questions in the same manner that you stated/taught them in the class. For example: if you teach the three characteristics of steel, don't ask in your test question: Which one of these is NOT a characteristic of steel - it's just tricky and mean. Also, for some reason it's hard for most people to have success with "null" answers. The number two rule is: stick to the facts. Do not include trivial information - the only intention of which is to confuse the test taker. For instance: Bob and Ed left their office on "K" Street in Washington DC at 4:45 pm to travel to BWI airport for a 9:00 pm flight - how far is the airport from their office? The times given have nothing to do with the answer you are seeking - in fact, we don't even have to know that Bob and Ed are leaving, do we? Here are a number of other "miscellaneous" rules:
INSTRUCTIONSInstructions are critical. You must do everything you can to make sure test takers know WHAT to do, and WHEN and HOW to do it. Examples:
It's also quite helpful to read the instructions out loud at the start of the test - even when they are clearly written on the test. It ensures everyone hears, sees, and interprets the directions the same way and allows you to ask for questions before anyone begins. SCORING OR WEIGHTINGIt is my personal preference that all test questions have the same value. It makes it a LOT easier to grade the test in the end. However, if you feel that certain areas of information are more critical to on-the-job success than others, then you may choose to weight those items more heavily. Let's look at the different types of evaluation items and go over some hints and "rules" for each. MULTIPLE CHOICE:Typically, when someone is not skilled at writing multiple choice questions, the correct answer will always be the longest answer - try to be aware of this and keep your answers to the same length. It's MUCH easier to provide 3 alternatives than 4; for some reason the 4th one is unbelievably hard to come up with. Each choice must be logically consistent. You cannot have: By the same token, the right answer shouldn't jump out from the list either. You'll want all choices to be somewhat feasible so that the test-taker has to put some critical thought in to their answer. Your list of possible choices don't have to be terribly difficult - remember you are testing people who have new knowledge and limited skill/experience - don't come up with answers that would stump you, come up with answers that would stump the unskilled person. If your answer begins with a vowel, the preceding question should end
with a(n); if it ends with an - which is grammatically correct - the question
itself automatically triggers the trainee to choose the answer that begins
with the vowel. For example; Parallel structure: all your choices should begin with similar phrasing/sentence structure; for example:
If you're going to provide "none of the above" (or "all of the above") as one of your choices, you should include it in ALL of your choices. If you have 15 multiple choice questions and only 1 or 2 have the option of "none of the above," it's a clear signal that the right answer is "none of the above." TRUE / FALSEIn true/false questions, make sure your options are entirely true or entirely false - do not include answers that might be true under certain conditions. Avoid what are known as "specific determiners" which signal
the correct answer - most obvious are ALWAYS and NEVER. Rarely is anything
always true or never true. The use of either of these words is usually
a clue to the test-taker to choose the other option. (For instance: "i"
always comes before "e.") We tend to write more true statements than false ones, because it's easier; so be aware of that and try to create an equal number of each. MATCHINGMatching questions are somewhat easier to create because you only have to come up with one right answer for the "B" column (as opposed to multiple choice which requires you to come up with 3+ "right" answers). Never provide more than 10 matching questions; if you DO want to provide more, break them up into chunks of 10 (perhaps that all deal with the same concept). More than 10 really bogs down the process for the test taker. Pretty soon all the letters and numbers are just swimming in front of their eyes. You may choose to provide more "B" column answers than "A" column questions. This makes the matching process a bit more difficult for the test taker. Do not provide more than three extra "B" column options, however. Alternatively, you may have less options in the "B" column and more questions in the "A" column. In this case you would instruct the test-taker to use the "B" column responses as many times as appropriate. For instance:
If you're going to create a one-of-a-kind question, be sure to provide a logical alternative, even if it doesn't fit any other possibility. For instance, A compass always points _______, should have the options of at least North and South in the "B" column. If only North is supplied, and you only have one question in the "A" column that has to do with direction, the correct answer is obvious to the test taker. OBSERVATIONSYou may be creating observation sheets that will go back to the job site and be administered by someone else there. When creating observation sheets: Include instructions for the observer - what should be the setting? Should the trainee be told in advance they will be observed? How long should the observation last? Should the observer give comments/feedback during the performance or wait until the end? Should the trainee be telling the observer what he is doing, or just do it (e.g. next, I will check the depth of )? Your observation sheet will more than likely be a checkoff list with
yes/no possibilities. The hardest part is breaking the activity down into
all of its components. Let's analyze the task of changing a car's oil.
You will have to decide how detailed you want the checkoff item to be
- is it enough to say "locate the oil cap" or should you start
with "open the hood?" The deciding factor will be how important
it is to have the interim steps done correctly or in a specific order.
If my ultimate goal is to make a salad - it doesn't really matter which
order I cut the vegetables in, so long as they all get in the salad. Likewise
I might chop the lettuce or hand-tear it - there is no "correct"
method as it all ends up making a salad in the end. But if I'm changing
a car's oil it IS important to remove the old oil before putting the new
in. If I am to relieve the pressure on a gasket ONLY if it reaches a certain
point, it is important that I correctly read the gauge, first. Open ended questions require the test-taker to complete using his/her own words. This type of question allows you to decide if they truly understand the question/situation. It is immensely hard to grade these types of questions; first, it is extremely time consuming, secondly, you'll find it quite subjective - even questions that you believe have a straightforward answer will inevitably have some unique responses. Unless there is no other way to determine if the trainee knows the right answer, my last choice would be to administer an open-ended question. ORDERING THE QUESTIONS USE OF RESOURCES
Nanette Miner, EdD, is President of The Training Doctor, LLC, a CT-based firm which specializes in the custom design of training to increase the performance of an organization's personnel assets. Reprinting of all or part of this article is prohibited without the express of the author. Please contact Dr. Miner at 1-800-282-5474 or nanette@trainingdr.com. Visit www.trainingdr.com for more information. |
Return to: Articles & Information You Can Use |
Connecticut |
![]() Privacy Policy |
South Carolina |